The interlocking directorate is anathema to trustbusters and corporate watchdogs. It occurs when a board member or top executive of one company sits on the board of another company, accumulating undue power over a given industry. When it reduces competition, the arrangement is forbidden by the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914.
If Henry De Lamar Clayton, the Alabama congressman who introduced the aforementioned act, were still with us, he’d presumably be shocked at the creation of the most far-reaching interlocking directorate in U.S. history. Obama Inc. has effectively won a seat on the board of companies at the heart of the nation’s industrial production and its financial system. The robber barons of old would marvel at the tentacles of influence of Barack Obama, a CEO whose power would overawe J.P. Morgan (the famous industrialist, not the bailed-out bank).
In difficult negotiations with business, Obama has the advantage of sitting at both sides of the table. This makes the art of the deal considerably simpler than when Donald Trump wrote about it years ago. Consider the matter of CAFE, the mileage standards that have been resisted by automakers for decades in a multifaceted regulatory and legal battle featuring enviros, the state of California, and industrial-state lawmakers. The other day, Obama snipped the Gordian knot in an offhand swipe with his fingernail clippers.
He gathered Detroit’s CEOs in the Rose Garden and announced they had acceded to a drastic increase in the standards to 39 mpg for cars in 2016. And why wouldn’t they? Both General Motors and Chrysler continue to exist on the basis of Obama’s good will. After their bankruptcies, the companies will give a 72 percent and 8 percent ownership stake, respectively, to the federal government. A president needn’t bother with the traditional “jawboning” of an industry, the tiresome work of a Harry Truman or Lyndon Johnson, if he carries that industry around in his back pocket.
As Chrysler headed into bankruptcy, the government got the company’s creditors that were dependent on TARP funds to do its bidding and take a substantial “haircut.” The banks, too, knew to heed the directive of the ultimate interlocking directorate.
As the next logical step, former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich has proposed putting public directors on the boards of all companies in which the government has an ownership stake. “In exercising their oversight function,” Reich writes, “they should seek guidance from the president and his top economic officials.”
Over time, this public-private arrangement will be subject to all the traditional pitfalls of interlocking directorates, from collusion to conflicts of interest to strategic myopia. The directorates have at times been used to create cartels, commonly defined as “a form of collusion between firms in the same industry aimed at restricting output and increasing prices.”
The new CAFE deal fits the definition almost exactly. It restricts the production of large automobiles, will increase the price of cars, and ignores the interests of the consumers. Except that industry doesn’t benefit from the cartel. It’s the senior partner, the federal government, that is wielding its industrywide influence to twist the market to its social-political ends.
Government doesn’t have to own a stake in its corporate partners to bring them to heel. The liberal lion in the House, Henry Waxman, got surprising industry buy-in on his draft of a cap-and-trade bill through giveaways that favored selected energy players.
Health-industry groups are jockeying for a place at Obama’s table on health-care reform so they can see to it that all the pain is inflicted on others. This is beggar-thy-neighbor industrial policy wherein government uses its power to inflict harm or bestow advantage to divide and conquer corporate America.
As a short-term political strategy, it’s unassailable. As a way to run an economy, it will prove corrupting and stultifying. The cause of the free-market capitalism awaits its Clayton to unravel the sprawling Obama directorate.
(c) 2009 by King Features Syndicate
Commentary
Obama’s interlocking directorate
- Commentary
-
-
From the bench ...
A judge sentencing a criminal defendant takes many factors into consideration. I cannot describe them all in one article, so this article will have a sequel.
-
Donation gives boost to this volunteer
Most people I come into contact with know that I am a board member for Susie’s Place, Hendricks County’s Child Advocacy Center.
-
— Senior moment —
In addition to all of the major happenings here in Hendricks County, sometimes this paper, the Hendricks County Flyer, holds a little gem, a surprise of a happening. Such was the case last week when I read of a play scheduled to take place at Brownsburg High School. This was not a play rehearsed for weeks and weeks, but a work completed just this summer by a college student, a BHS graduate of 2009.
-
The tax that wasn't
Prior to the passage of the health-care law, President Barack Obama was at his most emphatic and condescending in insisting the penalty for defying the mandate to buy health insurance is not a tax.
-
Letter to the Editor Oct. 27, 2010
I am not a citizen of the Avon community, but I feel compelled to point out what I consider to be a mis-statement in the article published in the Oct. 13 edition of the Hendricks County Flyer titled "ACSC considers school addition."
- Election note
- Letters to the editor 10-13-10
- Letter to the editor
- Letters to the editor 10-8-10
-
An education in spending
Of all the things the Newark, N.J., school system needs, the last of them is more money. Newark spends more per pupil than any other city in the country, and gets dismayingly little for it. For $22,000 per pupil — more than twice the national average — it graduates half its students.
- More Commentary Headlines
-
From the bench ...





